 |
The Libertine by Laurence Dunmore
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada
DVD detailsActor: John Malkovich, Johnny Depp, Paul Ritter, Samantha Morton, Stanley Townsend Director: Laurence Dunmore Brand: Genius Producer: John Malkovich Producer: Chase Bailey Producer: Colin Leventhal Producer: Daniel J.B. Taylor Producer: Donald A. Starr Producer: Jessica Parker Writer: Stephen Jeffreys DVD: Region Code 1 Audio: English (Unknown), Dolby Digital 5.1; English (Subtitled); Spanish (Subtitled); English (Original Language), Dolby Digital 5.1 Format: Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen Picture Format: 1.66:1 Running Time: 114 minutes Published: 2006-07-01 DVD Release Date: 2006-07-04 Audience Rating: R (Restricted) Model: 79406 Studio: Weinstein Company Product features: - Johnny Depp stars as the decadent John Wilmot, the second Earl of Rochester. The film follows the Earl s adventures in London, from his passionate romance with a young actress, to the writing of a scurrilous play which blisteringly and bawdily lampoons the very monarch who commissioned it, Charles II, leading to the Earl s banishment and eventual downfall. Format: DVD MOVIE Genre:?DRAMA
DVD Reviews of The LibertineDVD Review: Fascinating Period and Character Sketch Summary: 4 Stars
Rochester, who died at the age of 33, spent his early years pursuing pleasure and circulating (though not publishing) satiric verse and his latter years suffering the consequences of these pursuits. When the film begins Rochester is already suffering the effects of a syphillis that is rapidly devouring his body and will eventually devour his face. The opening and closing monologues (that cleverly mimic the stage conventions of the day) are delivered not to a Restoration audience but to us. Despite his brilliant beginning as a satirist of the first rank in a moment in time when satiric verse was the mode of choice for cultivated libertines and wits, as the film opens, Rochester, who is apparently speaking from the grave of the dark, dank and putridly-hued London of the 1670's, is not interested in offereing us his verse but his very soul and this film, like its main character, dares you to turn away.
For the libertines the London social world of the 1670's was an endless round of drinking, theatre going, debauchery and riot. Some libertines like Rochester were nobles who served the King in whatever capacity the King chose (Rochester served in the navy, as well as waited on the King); in this the court, however, the King himself was, privately, a libertine as well and so it was very difficult for him to discipline those around him. Rochester, with his lightening quick and profane wit, was this dissolute world's biggest celebrity. What Rochester did in real life became the stuff of Restoration theatre. His friends included the dramatists William Wycherley and George Etherege whose most famous character, Dorimant, was based upon his manners, habits, and appetites. He was also friends with his employer the King who regularly banished him for his misdeeds (though usually not for long).
A look at Rochester's poems will show that he was seemingly interested in only two things: drinking and swiving. But this is somewhat deceptive. Rochester seemed to pride himself on the insatiability of his appetite for both but he was also very interested in writing from a variety of perspectives(sometimes adopting a female persona) and though on the surface his verse seems like just a bunch of bawdy limericks, it actually offers a penetrating glimpse into the workings of a fascinating mind that is complex and conflicted about his own and other's social, sexual and spiritual identities. The film really only scratches the surface and gives you that part of Rochester that lends itself to film, that is to dramatization/visualization. In some respects, however, the vulgar exploitative nature of cinema in many ways seems like the perfect vehicle with which to tell this story which is about salacious scandal, the art of maintaining and/or destroying reputations (which are usually just facades anyway), and the public's fascination with the private lives (the more corrupt the better) of public figures. Rochester fascinates because he seems to see through the vice and folly of power and though he is never quite above it, he seems capable of distancing himself from it (at times he would disappear from court and spend weeks writing in the country). He seems to be aroused by the juxtaposition of high society's penchant for glamourous excess/decadence and the equally potent and seductive allure of the lewd and brutal underworld. His own poetry seems to speak simultaneously from the upper and lower echelons of London (and his favorite location in which to set his poetry was St. James Park, a notorious site of carnivalesque intrigue and sexual liberty). Depp, with that eternally boyish glint in his eye, who charms with every grin, seems like someone who probably knows more about the former world, but he is someone that we believe may be sympathetic and therefore receptive (at least imaginatively) to the seductive force of the latter world.
Malkovich also offers a convincing portrait of a troubled King who wants to be perceived as a leader but who cannot seem to ween himself from his own appetite for young girls. The public knows the King is weak and they suspect him of secretly being a Catholic. What the King really wants from his friend Rochester is a piece of theatrical propaganda that will transform his reputation if not his actual person. But Rochester is not one to blush in the face of facts and his talent is to tell things like they are so he not only refuses to lie but he will tell the truth in as theatrical and bawdy a fashion as possible. And instead of offering the public a respectable version of their "protestant" King, Rochester offers them a portrait of a lascivious fool and his equally lascivious court of hangers on. His play, Sodom (which involves onstage nudity and live lewd acts), does not amuse the King. It does amuse the visiting French ambassador however!
What we get in the film is Rochester's lifestyle most of all--the drinking, whoring, and cavorting. We also get glimpses of the inner life--the ennui, the despair, the boredom of one who is trapped in a society (and humanity as he perceives it) that he, sometimes, views as insipid and ridiculous. But what makes the film watchable is that we also get Rochester's humor and feel for common humanity: the scene where Rochester is having his portrait painted (replete with monkey companion) is splendid comedy and his friendship with his servant, Allcock, seems genuine. There are just enough moments of light humor that we find that we do like him after all and even might feel like we kind of understand him as well. As Rochester well knew those surrounding the court and occupying high social positions often feign superiority and comfort themselves with decorous public masks while living debauched lives, but, to his credit Rochester is who he is in private and in public. It is not quite clear why his very Christian wife loves him, however, and that is one weakness of the film. His wife was the wealthier of the two and Rochester's idea of courtship was to kidnap her. This caused a scandal and did not immediately result in their marriage (they would marry two years later)but they both liked to relive that intitial encounter when they rode in their carriage between London and their country estate. Ultimately we know very little of her, and his children, who he apparently was very affectionate with, are entirely absent from the film. Instead the film focuses on his many mistresses, one of which was the stage actress Elizabeth Barry.
Rochester's interest in the theatre was genuine (he loved disguises his whole life; Dr. Bendo being his most elaborate) and even though he could not apparently write a succesful drama his service to the King required him to play many roles (including flatterer, sycophant, cynic, satirist). He also trained an actress who would eventually become one of his mistresses. Apparently he took on the task of training a talentless actress on a bet. Just what the training of this actress might mean in the larger scheme of things is not exactly clear. Perhaps his empathy with women was genuine (even though much of his verse seems to be misogynistic) and he wished to do at least one productive thing in his otherwise destructive life. He seems to have been drawn to the actress Elizabeth Barry's youth perhaps because he had none left of his own. The stage was a place of transformation and perhaps the attraction to both stage and Elizabeth Barry was an attraction to the possibility that he could somehow transform and/or reform himself. Actresses at this time were considered to be little more than prostitutes and often Rochester considered authors to be little more than prostitutes as well and so perhaps the mutual attraction was also a mutual understanding and identification (at least on Rochester's part).
In the end, according to the film, Rochester repented of his sins and made his peace with God as well as with his King and country. But no one really knows what Rochester's last thoughts were. The accounts of the death bed conversion were circulated by the priest and Rochester's very devout wife (ironically she converted to Catholicism at Rochester's request soon after they wed) who also took it upon herself to burn many of his drawings and writings so whether this version of her husbands's final moments was the real version or her own fictional account of things as she would like them to have been (and as she would like him to appear in historical accounts) is anyone's guess.
As period films go this is not your usual fare. And as character portraits go this one is not going to be displayed in a public cinema for all to see (if it came to a theatre near you at all it probably did not stay long or garner much attention). If you are a person who likes to hear subversive sides of history, and you do not shy away from the unconventional character study, this just might be your period and character sketch.
More The Libertine reviews: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Description of The LibertineOscar® nominee* Johnny Depp delivers "a tour de force performance" (Baz Bamigboye, The Daily Mail) in the "seductively entertaining" (Jan Stuart, Newsday) The Libertine. As the celebrated writer and bad boy John Wilmot, second Earl of Rochester, Depp brings to life a decadent 17th century London. There, Wilmot falls passionately in love with his aspiring actress muse (Oscar® nominee Samantha Morton**), but is cast from the heights of privileged society when he scandalizes King Charles II (Oscar® nominee John Malkovich***) with a shockingly audacious play. At the depths of ruin, the rebel seeks redemption on his own terms. "Johnny Depp is brilliant," raves Cosmopolitan, while Peter Travers of Rolling Stone calls The Libertine a "one-of-a-kind spellbinder."
|
 |