The Handmaid's Tale

The Handmaid's Tale

The Handmaid's Tale
Our Price: $79.99
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Buy Used: from $30.79 (click here)
Category: DVD
See more DVD details


(Click here)
Buy this DVD movie at online store in your country
Canada

DVD details

Actor: Aidan Quinn, Elizabeth McGovern, Faye Dunaway, Natasha Richardson, Victoria Tennant
DVD: Region Code 1
Audio: English (Unknown), Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo; English (Subtitled); Spanish (Subtitled); French (Subtitled); English (Original Language), Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo
Format: Anamorphic, Closed-captioned, Color, Dolby, DVD, NTSC, Subtitled, Widescreen
Picture Format: 1.85:1
Running Time: 108 minutes
DVD Release Date: 2001-12-11
Audience Rating: R (Restricted)
Studio: MGM (Video & DVD)

DVD Reviews of The Handmaid's Tale

DVD Review: A disappointing adaptation of a feminist classic.
Summary: 3 Stars

If you've never read Margaret Atwood's THE HANDMAID'S TALE, the 1990 film adaptation by Volker Schlöndorff might seem an interesting enough movie. Set in a future in which Christian fundamentalists have overthrown the government, the film paints a terrifying picture of an American theocracy. Women, homosexuals, religious minorities, people of color, political dissidents - all suffer under the oppressive thumb of The Republic of Gilead.

Those familiar with the 1985 novel will see that much of the basic story remains the same in Schlöndorff's on-screen adaptation. The former United States is in the midst of a Civil War; The Republic of Gilead holds much of the East Coast, while dissenting religious and secular groups wage war to the South and West. Within the Republic's borders, a strict social structure is enforced. Men are ranked according to prestige and merit (Commanders, Eyes, Angels, Guardians, and businessmen and professionals), while women are grouped according to social function, which is primarily determined by their reproductive health and racial makeup (Aunts, Wives and Daughters, Econowives, Handmaids, Marthas, and Unwomen). While no Gileadean citizen is truly free, it is the females who bear the brunt of Gilead's religious tyranny.

It is in this context that we meet Kate (Offred), a Handmaid who has been assigned to Commander Fred ("Of Fred") and his Wife, Serena Joy. THE HANDMAID'S TALE is Kate's tale, told in her very own voice, through a disjointed series of flashbacks and present-day narrations. Through Kate's eyes, we reflect upon "the days before"; we learn how the Sons of Jacob were able to destabilize and eventually topple the American government and institute their own patriarchal theocracy; and we get a glimpse of what daily life in the Republic is like.

Overall, the film retains the tone of the Atwood's story. It's all there: Kate's re-education at The Red Center; the Birthing Ceremony, Prayvaganza, and Women's Salvaging and Particicution; trips to the gynecologist; illicit visits to the Commander's office; the night out at Jezebel's; and, of course, the monthly rape Ceremonies. The acting is solid enough: Natasha Richardson (as Kate), Faye Dunaway (Serena Joy), and Elizabeth McGovern (Moira) are the cast's standouts, though Aidan Quinn (Nick) and Robert Duvall (the Commander) leave something to be desired. The visuals really steal the movie; it's incredible to see Atwood's story take form on-screen. (My favorite prop is a livestock trailer used to transport women to and from the Red Center.) Altogether, it makes for a terrifying dystopian sci fi film...that is, if you haven't yet been "spoiled" by the novel.

While the movie does follow the basic plot of THE HANDMAID'S TALE, the filmmakers change a number of small, seemingly insignificant details. Upon closer examination, many of these minor points are actually quite important, and their alteration impacts the story in unanticipated ways, both on an individual and collective level.

The most drastic change comes from the costume department. The citizens of Gilead are all required to wear uniforms which reflect their place in the social hierarchy. Men largely don military-type uniforms, while women wear dresses of various colors: brown for Aunts, blue for Wives, black for Widows, and white for Daughters; dresses striped red, blue, and green for Econowives; red habits with white headresses ("Wings") for Handmaids; green smocks for Marthas; gray dresses for Unwomen; and revealing vintage contraband (think Playboy bunnies and cheerleaders) for Jezebels. These outfits can be seen in the film, but with modifications.

Take the Handmaid's uniform, for example. As envisioned by Atwood, the Handmaid's habit (a type of sack-like dress) is almost as concealing as an Islamic burqa: it covers the Handmaid from her wrists to her ankles. She also wears red gloves and stockings, so that the only pieces of flesh that are visible are her neck and face - and even those are somewhat obscured, what with the red veil and white headdress. Underneath her scarlet red habit is a white cotton underdress and bulky, oversized underwear. During the hot summers, she switches to a habit made of lighter material, but it's no more revealing than her winter wardrobe.

In comparison, the uniform worn by Natasha Richardson is relatively immodest: the hem of the habit ends mid-shin, revealing precious inches of the Handmaid's legs to hungry, sex-starved men, while the thin material gives an outline of the womanly shape beneath. Scandalous!

Worse still, there are no Wings atop Richardson's head! The Handmaid's headdress conceals her face from the prying eyes of the world - and the world from her prying eyes (much like a horse's blinders). The Wings keep Handmaids ignorant, innocent, submissive. They're an essential part of the uniform, and yet they are completely absent in the movie. I understand why; blinders must make filming an actor's facial expressions quite a difficult task, natch. Still, that's the point of the Wings - they're a tool of subjugation, keeping the wearer unaware of her very surroundings.

Even the visual difference between a Handmaid-with-Wings and a Handmaid-without-Wings is striking.

The Handmaid's isn't the only outfit that's been fiddled with. Serena Joy, too, can be seen wearing a dress that's much more revealing than Gilead's strict, Puritanical, anti-sex dress code would ever allow. While the Wives don't seem to have a singular uniform - any modest blue dress will do - it's a given that the dress shouldn't show too much skin. Yet, at one point, you can actually catch a glimpse of Faye Dunaway's cleavage - as if!

Casual filmgoers might not place much importance on these changes - but they are significant. The Republic of Gilead is an oppressive, misogynistic, uber-conservative society. Every aspect of the culture feeds into this Biblically-based repression, right down the the mandated uniforms. Given the many functions of clothing - separating citizens into rank and social function, concealing the female form, further subjugating the Handmaids in particular - you might even say that the clothing is an uncredited star of THE HANDMAID'S TALE. Or rather, it should be; in altering the clothing, the filmmakers have undermined its importance. Consequently, they have removed an especially oppressive aspect of Gilead's regime.

These "minor" changes only begin with the costumes. Like the clothing, many of these details implicitly or explicitly speak to the treatment of women, and in so changing these minutiae, the filmmakers detract from the feeling of stifling oppression faced by Gilead's female population.

* Women move about (relatively) freely, belying the government's actual constraints on women described so starkly in the novel.

* Commander Fred's Bible isn't secured under lock and key, but is kept out on a podium, where any uppity woman might find it.

* In the film, Commander Fred is Kate's first placement, not her third, thereby reducing the pressure on her to succeed in bearing a child.

* When Kate visits the doctor (gynecologist), the sheet separating Kate's face from her torso is gone, thereby allowing the doctor to (gasp!) look her in the eyes (and otherwise interact with her on a personal level) as he pokes and prods her naked body.

* During the initial Ceremony/rape scene, it is Offred who is crying, while Serena remains stone-faced and silent. In Atwood's version, the roles are reversed; consequently, the fundamentalist Serena is shown regretting at least one aspect of the society she fought for, while Kate once again appears detached from her body.

* The Birthing Ceremony is short one Birth Chair and, even more glaringly, Ofwarren is allowed to handle the baby afterwards. This is in contrast to the novel, where the Wife is the center of attention, to the point where her fellow party-goers act as though it is she, and not her Handmaid, who gave birth to the baby. (This sequence is quite the spectacle.)

The initial sitting room scene between Kate and Nick also undergoes a seemingly small change that in actuality alters the entire dynamic of the sequence - and their relationship throughout the film. In this scene, Kate sneaks out of her room late one night and steals away to Serena Joy's sitting room. She wants to explore her surroundings, taste a scrap of freedom, maybe even steal a small keepsake, something that won't be missed. Nick, meanwhile, has been sent by the Commander to find Kate and arrange for her to meet the Commander the following night in his office. The two interlopers, having stumbled upon one another in the moonlight, share a brief but hungry kiss.

Where the novel and film differ is in the following exchange. While Nick explains the Commander's wishes to Kate, they remain in a furtive embrace. In Atwood's imagination, Nick strokes Kate's arm as he talks; Schlöndorff has Nick groping Kate's breast. Schlöndorff's version throws off the power balance, making Nick seem more like a creepy pervert, taking advantage of his Commander's Handmaid. Correspondingly, Kate as played by Richardson seems less like a willing participant in the exchange and more like a victim of sexual assault, so submissive and subjugated that she's been conditioned to accept the manhandling of strangers. (Which may very well be the case, but it's not indicative of the kiss, nor of their subsequent relationship.)
In reality, this is a mutually desired interaction (and, later, a mutually desired relationship). Kate and Nick both suffer under Gilead (though Kate more so than Nick), and their relationship is a brief respite from the stifling oppression of their daily existence. The affair also offers them a small sense of control in a world in which they have none. They are dissidents, deviants, criminals, brought together by lust and loneliness. Unlike most of Gilead's arranged and prescribed human relationships, theirs is genuine - a sentiment that Schlöndorff fails to convey.

These are but a few of the many changes foisted upon Atwood's novel during its metamorphosis to screenplay. Others are equally puzzling but don't fundamentally alter the tenor of the story. Moira, for instance, is introduced as Kate's newfound friend from The Red Center rather than her best friend from college. Later, Kate is shown aiding Moira in her escape from The Red Center, even though she was as surprised as everyone else when Moira turned up missing. During Kate's assignment to Commander Fred's household, he leaves town, and so Serena sends Kate back to The Red Center during his absence (so poor Serena won't have to suffer the Handmaid for naught). This struck me as an especially odd invention, since it was also somewhat unnecessary.

Even the casting is a little puzzling. I found it odd, for instance, that a brunette Faye Dunaway was cast as the blond Serena Joy, and a blond Natasha Richardson plays a brunette Kate. The significance of the characters' hair color isn't in stereotypes about blonds and brunettes, but it does go to Serena Joy's character (and hypocrisy therein): in noting Serena's hair color, Kate comments that, in "the days before", she naturally assumed that Serena's blondness came from a bottle. Because, well, that's the type of Christian Serena Joy was/is: do as I say, not as I do. ("Women who work outside the home are selfish, except for me; I'm making a sacrifice for the greater good. Women should not be vain and overly concerned with their looks, but hey, I'm on teevee!") Seriously, could they not have dyed the actors' hair?

The most substantial change comes at the film's end. The novel is presented as a series of disjointed flashbacks and seemingly present-day narration; we later learn that it's all a series of recollections. THE HANDMAID'S TALEs are just that, a series of tales, with no apparent beginning (just the vague "the days before") and no real end, since we don't know what became of Kate (or Gilead, even, just that it eventually fell). In contrast, the film is told as a story, with a discrete beginning and end. And what an end: before her escape, Kate kills the Commander, and then is whisked away to the Western frontier by the May Day group. At film's end, we see a very pregnant Kate hiding out in a camper in the mountains, riding out the Civil War. As far as Hollywood endings go, it's not completely wrapped up, but when you compare it to Atwood's grim conclusion, the movie ending looks downright rosy.

Cumulatively, the "minor" changes represent a significant deviation from Atwood's story - and the sanitized Hollywood ending is an abomination. Consequently, THE HANDMAID'S TALE is a dark film, but nowhere near as terrifying, oppressive and believable as the novel. If it had been crafted from an original script, I'd probably quite enjoy it - four stars, maybe? But knowing what it could have been, I'm somewhat disappointed in the on-screen outcome.

Which leaves me hoping that Joss Whedon will soon shoot a remake. (Hey, it's been nearly two decades!)
More The Handmaid's Tale reviews:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Description of The Handmaid's Tale

With "cool eroticism, intelligence and intensity" (Playboy), this eerie futuristic thriller,based on Margaret Atwood's controversial and critically acclaimed best-selling novel, is filled with "large themes and deep thoughts" (Roger Ebert). Boasting a phenomenal cast, including Natasha Richardson (Nell) and Oscar(r) winners* Faye Dunaway (Network) and Robert Duvall (Tender Mercies), this film "dazzles with its ingenuity and shocks with its outrageousness" (WNCN Radio)! In the not-so-distant future, strong-willed and beautiful Kate (Richardson) possesses a precious commodity that most women have lost and most men want to control fertility. Forced into a brain-washing boot camp that turns fertile women into surrogate mothers for social-elite men and their infertile wives, Kate thinks she's made out well when she's assigned to an eminent partyleader (Duvall). But when she learns that he's sterile, she's faced with the impossible choice: produce him an heir or die! *Dunaway: Actress, Network (1976); Duvall: Actor, Tender Mercies (1983)
Set in a time when a buildup of toxic chemicals has made most people sterile, Volker Schlondorff's film offers a disturbing view of a society under martial law in which fertile women are captured and made into handmaids to bear children for rich and infertile matrons. The film unfolds from the eyes of newly converted handmaid Kate (Natasha Richardson). She is trapped in this mysogynistic society which both deifies these fertile women as prized possessions and condemns them as whores. Throughout the story Kate has to cope with the jealousy of the woman she serves (Faye Dunaway), the advances of her sleazy military husband (the Commander, played by Robert Duvall), and the loss of her daughter, who has been shuttled off to a similarly aristocratic setting. She also falls in love with one of the Commander's security guards (Aidan Quinn), who sympathizes with her plight and potentially offers her a way out. Throughout The Handmaid's Tale, issues of feminism, abortion rights, male dominance, and conservative religious politics all come under fire. Some may view the film itself as antifemale considering its concepts, but it is quite the opposite. Instead it shows how only through solidarity can women bring down an overriding patriarchical mindset. The film, which works from Harold Pinter's screenplay adaption of Margaret Atwood's novel, features strong performances from those mentioned as well as Elizabeth McGovern and Victoria Tennant. --Bryan Reesman
Bestsellers in DVD
The Story of Jeremiah [VHS] ImageThe Story of Jeremiah [VHS]
Vision Video; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Wresting With God [VHS] ImageWresting With God [VHS]
by Vision Video
Vision Video; Published: 1990-10-01; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Price in other shops: $19.99
Study Bible Video with Workbook [VHS] ImageStudy Bible Video with Workbook [VHS]
Spring Arbor Distributors; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Best price: $7.95
Price in other shops: $44.00
Tempo:Childrens TV Favourites Video [VHS] ImageTempo:Childrens TV Favourites Video [VHS]
HarperCollins Audio; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Best price: $9.17
Price in other shops: $9.98
Tempo.Herbs:Parseley'Sb/Party Video [VHS] ImageTempo.Herbs:Parseley'Sb/ Party Video [VHS]
HarperCollins Audio; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Strike the Original Match [VHS] ImageStrike the Original Match [VHS]
New Liberty Films; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Price in other shops: $14.95
Medjugorje The Miracles and the Message [VHS] ImageMedjugorje The Miracles and the Message [VHS]
JPN Film Production; Release date: 1995-12-15; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Best price: $29.99
Mayo Clinic Echocardiography Review Course for Boards and Recertification DVD 2008 ImageMayo Clinic Echocardiography Review Course for Boards and Recertification DVD 2008
by Mayo
DVD
Price in other shops: $1,463.24
Pediatric Diagnostic Imaging DVD: Single User ImagePediatric Diagnostic Imaging DVD: Single User
by Oakstone
DVD
Price in other shops: $1,463.24
Cost Accounting [VHS] ImageCost Accounting [VHS]
by Charles T. Horngren, George Foster, Srikant M. Datar, Howard Teall
Pearson Canada, Toronto; VHS Tape; VHS Video
Similar DVDs, VHS Video, Audio CDs
Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale (Readers Guide) ImageAtwood's The Handmaid's Tale (Readers Guide)
by Gina Wisker
Continuum; Published: 2010-08-03; Paperback; Book
Best price: $14.15
Price in other shops: $19.95
Shall We Dance? (1996) ImageShall We Dance? (1996)
Buena Vista Home Video; Release date: 2012-01-04; DVD
Best price: $17.48
Price in other shops: $19.98
Spark Notes: The Handmaid's Tale (Margaret Atwood) ImageSpark Notes: The Handmaid's Tale (Margaret Atwood)
Spark Publishing; Published: 2002-07-15; Paperback; Book
Best price: $15.95
The Lover ImageThe Lover
Sony; Release date: 2001-12-11; DVD
Best price: $5.94
Price in other shops: $14.98
1984 Image1984
Release date: 2003-03-04; DVD
Best price: $43.50
The Handmaid's Tale (Everyman's Library) ImageThe Handmaid's Tale (Everyman's Library)
by Margaret Atwood
Everyman's Library; Published: 2006-10-17; Hardcover; Book
Best price: $15.33
Price in other shops: $25.00
Fahrenheit 451 ImageFahrenheit 451
Universal Studios; Release date: 2003-04-01; DVD
Best price: $7.13
Price in other shops: $12.98
A Boy & His Dog ImageA Boy & His Dog
dolby digitals; Release date: 1999-04-13; DVD
Best price: $1.57
Price in other shops: $19.99
The Handmaid's Tale (Cliffs Notes) ImageThe Handmaid's Tale (Cliffs Notes)
by Mary Ellen Snodgrass
Cliffs Notes; Published: 1994-10-31; Paperback; Book
Best price: $2.29
Price in other shops: $5.99
The Handmaid's Tale ImageThe Handmaid's Tale
by Margaret Atwood
Anchor; Published: 1998-03-16; Paperback; Book
Best price: $7.50
Price in other shops: $15.00
Compare prices and read customer reviews for more than one million DVD titles.
Oscar 2005 Winners